|
Fig. c3t3P4: Atypia has been accepted in the category of “Spitz nevus;” the level of acceptance has compromised the utility of the concept, or raised questions regarding the accuracy of the related system of logic (a system in which attempts are made to accommodate nevoid qualities). The atypia in this example is moderately severe. There is nuclear pleomorphism with variation in nuclear size and staining. Upward migration of both nests of cells and individual cells has also been accepted in the category. Even though this lesion is thin, it has migrated into the upper portion of the reticular dermis. At the advancing deep margin, individual neoplastic cells extend among the collagen bundles. Lymphoid infiltrates are mild. In the junctional component, there are scattered giant cells.
Note: Commonly, dermatopathologists have accepted properties and patterns in the “Spitz nevus” category which, if evaluated using the logic pertaining to the common melanoma, have more in common with melanoma than “nevus.” Cytologic atypia and pleomorphism, upward migration of neoplastic cells in the epidermis, migrant vertical growth-like patterns are acceptable truth functions in one system of logic that has been promoted as having relevance for the interpretations of “Spitz nevi.” Perhaps, much of the controversy which currently is associated with a diagnosis of “Spitz nevus” is related to too great a reliance on a faulty system of logic. As a starter, the Spitz lesion might be transferred from the nevoid category to the category of intermediate melanocytic neoplasia (i.e., minimal deviation melanoma, Spitz type). In anticipation of the objections to this recommendation, the lesion might be characterized as juvenile melanoma; the implications essentially would be the same.
|